1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1986 Nissan Laurel
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mustang | 1986 Nissan Laurel | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Laurel |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
