1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1988 Volvo 245
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1988 Volvo 245. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1988 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Volvo 245. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1988 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 245 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |