1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,655 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 335 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (386 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4655 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |