1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus would be higher. At 4,655 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus. (208 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (386 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Gaus |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4655 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |