1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Mazda 6

To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 211 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.

Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Mustang 2001 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 6
Year Released 1996 2001
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4601 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 139 HP
Torque 556 Nm 181 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1345 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2680 mm