1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Kia Pregio
To start off, 2004 Kia Pregio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 257 more horse power than 2004 Kia Pregio. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Pregio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Pregio weights approximately 335 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Pregio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 2004 Kia Pregio | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Mustang | Pregio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 93 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |