1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 195 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | B3000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 244 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3200 mm |