1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 575 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 382 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |