1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Mustang | I-290 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 258 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3210 mm |