1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,655 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 99 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (386 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mustang | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Mustang | Condor |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4655 cc | 2436 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
