1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (164 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 9 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Mustang 2009 Honda CR-V
Make Ford Honda
Model Mustang CR-V
Year Released 1996 2009
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 2353 cc
Horse Power 212 HP 164 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1461 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2630 mm