1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Nissan Micra

To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 28 kg more than 2010 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Mustang 2010 Nissan Micra
Make Ford Nissan
Model Mustang Micra
Year Released 1996 2010
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 1386 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 212 HP 87 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1442 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 3720 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2440 mm