1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 271 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Micra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2449 mm |