1996 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1996 Ford Mustang. (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 315 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
Model | Mustang | Virage |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 490 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4703 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2061 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1282 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |