1996 Ford Ranger vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1996 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ranger. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ranger | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ranger | 280 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 198 Nm | 258 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2410 mm |