1996 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Ranger weights approximately 685 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ranger | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Minica |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2350 mm |