1996 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Ranger (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Ractis. (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Ractis.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ranger | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Ractis |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 198 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |