1996 Ford Ranger vs. 2009 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 376 kg more than 1996 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (435 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Ranger 2009 Jaguar XF
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Ranger XF
Year Released 1996 2009
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2507 cc 2720 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 118 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 198 Nm 435 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 1771 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4970 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2920 mm