1996 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ranger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 522 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ranger | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Ranger | Phantom |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3820 mm |