1996 Ford Royale vs. 1965 Steyr 650T
To start off, 1996 Ford Royale is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Because 1965 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Royale | 1965 Steyr 650T | |
| Make | Ford | Steyr |
| Model | Royale | 650T |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 2970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1850 mm |
