1996 Ford Royale vs. 1973 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1996 Ford Royale is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 1000.
Because 1973 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Royale | 1973 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Royale | 1000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2270 mm |