1996 Ford Royale vs. 1981 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 1996 Ford Royale is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Royale.

Because 1981 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1981 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Royale.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Royale 1981 Lincoln Continental
Make Ford Lincoln
Model Royale Continental
Year Released 1996 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 4942 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 109 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 173 Nm 313 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 5570 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2990 mm