1996 Ford Royale vs. 1986 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1996 Ford Royale is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 562 more horse power than 1996 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Royale.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Royale | 1986 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Royale | XJR |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 6499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 671 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2770 mm |