1996 Ford Royale vs. 1987 Zastava 750
To start off, 1996 Ford Royale is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1987 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava 750.
Because 1987 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava 750. (56 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Royale | 1987 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Royale | 750 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 56 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |