1996 Ford Royale vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Royale would be higher. Both 1996 Ford Royale and 2003 Volvo C70 are equipped with a 1,984 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Royale | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Royale | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |