1996 Ford Royale vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1996 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Royale | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Royale | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2600 mm |