1996 Ford Saetta vs. 1966 Holden EH
To start off, 1996 Ford Saetta is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Saetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Saetta | 1966 Holden EH | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Saetta | EH |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2680 mm |