1996 Ford Saetta vs. 1966 Simca 1200S
To start off, 1996 Ford Saetta is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Saetta is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Saetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Saetta has automatic transmission and 1966 Simca 1200S has manual transmission. 1966 Simca 1200S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Saetta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Saetta | 1966 Simca 1200S | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Saetta | 1200S |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2240 mm |