1996 Ford Saetta vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 1996 Ford Saetta is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Saetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Saetta has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 132 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Saetta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Saetta | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Saetta | 132 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2560 mm |
