1996 Ford Saetta vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Saetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Saetta would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Saetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Saetta has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Saetta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Saetta 2009 Mazda RX-8
Make Ford Mazda
Model Saetta RX-8
Year Released 1996 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 1308 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 0 HP 232 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2710 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]