1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1964 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 999 cc, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 1964 Reliant Rebel has manual transmission. 1964 Reliant Rebel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1964 Reliant Rebel | |
| Make | Ford | Reliant |
| Model | Synergy 2010 | Rebel |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 600 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
