1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1965 Saab MC
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Saab MC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Saab MC would be higher. At 999 cc, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Saab MC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 1965 Saab MC has manual transmission. 1965 Saab MC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1965 Saab MC | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Synergy 2010 | MC |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 841 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 54 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
