1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1977 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 1977 Triumph Stag has manual transmission. 1977 Triumph Stag will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1977 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Synergy 2010 | Stag |
Year Released | 1996 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |