1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Synergy 2010 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |