1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1982 Simca 1100
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 1,117 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Simca 1100 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 1982 Simca 1100 has manual transmission. 1982 Simca 1100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1982 Simca 1100 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Synergy 2010 | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 1117 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
