1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Synergy 2010 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
