1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Synergy 2010 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |