1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2000 Rover 45 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Rover 45 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 2000 Rover 45 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Synergy 2010 | 45 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
