1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda Roadster has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Synergy 2010 | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
