1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Hardbody has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Synergy 2010 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |