1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Synergy 2010 | TT |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |