1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Synergy 2010 | Armada |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |