1996 Ford Synergy 2010 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 has automatic transmission and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy has manual transmission. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | 2012 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Synergy 2010 | Caddy |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |