1996 Ford Taurus vs. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. (173 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief weights approximately 132 kg more than 1996 Ford Taurus.
Because 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Taurus | 1954 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Taurus | Star Chief |
Year Released | 1996 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3400 cc | 4715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3110 mm |