1996 Ford Taurus vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (235 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Taurus weights approximately 752 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Taurus (312 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Taurus | 2000 Honda FCX | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Taurus | FCX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3392 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 273 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |
