1996 Ford Taurus vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (235 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Taurus weights approximately 82 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Taurus (312 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Taurus | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | B3000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3392 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 74 L |