1996 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1996 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Thunderbird | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Thunderbird | Fronte |
Year Released | 1996 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |