1996 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2002 Spyker C8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 470 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Ford | Spyker |
Model | Thunderbird | C8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |