1996 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 565 kg more than 1996 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Thunderbird | 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Thunderbird | ML |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2720 mm |