1996 Ford Tracer vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1996 Ford Tracer is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (81 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 329 kg more than 1996 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Tracer | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Tracer | Bellel |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
